Re: COPYLEFT SIGN

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 06:25:33 EDT


Ar 11:54 -0800 2000-05-15, scr�obh John Cowan:
>Michael Everson wrote:
>>
>> Despite what John says about some linguistic communities below, you cannot
>> stipulate that terms are translatable or non-translatable.
>
>It's not about *stipulating* untranslatability, but just untranslatability
>de facto. Do you complain because U+0A74 is GURMUKHI EK ONKAR instead
>of GURMUKHI GOD IS ONE? How about U+2638 WHEEL OF DHARMA? Untranslatable
>terms need to be left alone, that's all.

DHARMA is a perfectly good English word now.

COPYRIGHT is translatable. COPYLEFT would also have to be.

But what I read is that it is "forecasted" to be popular. It is certainly
NOT the same thing as the EURO SIGN.

Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT