LATIN U/V

From: Robert Brady ([email protected])
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 14:08:33 EDT

Next message: [email protected]: "Info required on GSM 03.38"
Previous message: Robert Brady: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Cowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: [email protected]: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Curtis Clark: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

What codepoint should be used to encode the letter which later seperated
into U/V?

-- 
Robert

Next message: [email protected]: "Info required on GSM 03.38"
Previous message: Robert Brady: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Cowan: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: [email protected]: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Curtis Clark: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Maybe reply: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: LATIN U/V"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT