Re: UTF-8N?

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Thu Jun 22 2000 - 09:18:51 EDT


On 06/21/2000 06:33:57 PM <jcowan@reutershealth.com> wrote:

>> The standard doesn't ever discuss the BOM in the context of UTF-8,
>
>See section 13.6 (page 324).

Sure enough. Well, there you go: the confusion is officially sanctioned!

Peter Constable



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:04 EDT