Re: Fwd: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Nov 23 2000 - 05:26:39 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Lakota reprise: (Re)birth of a character"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Fwd: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Fwd: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ar 15:28 -0800 2000-11-22, scr�obh Tex Texin:

>Which brings up the question, when do we encode the
>comic book (non-spacing) zig-zaggy-balloon-thingie that goes around
>the text for pow!, biff#@!, bam%$#!, and shazam! ?

Asmus and I are looking into this.

Of course there is the question, should the "thought bubble" be unified
with the "speech bubble"?

Bwahahahahahah.....

Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Lakota reprise: (Re)birth of a character"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Fwd: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Fwd: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:15 EDT