Michka,
The fact that a product supports Unicode and does not support another
code
page used in some region, does not mean that the vendor
supports that region, nor does it mean if they decide to support the
region that it would be only with Unicode...
tex
"Michael (michka) Kaplan" wrote:
>
> From: "Tex Texin" <texin@progress.com>
>
> > If I had some examples from IBM, Sun, HP, Unisys, etc. then
> > the benefit would not read like Microsoft is all that matters.
>
> Since there are locales that do not have specific code pages recognized by
> other vendors, I think you already have the proof you are asking for?
>
> I do not see anyone rushing out to provide support for every random code
> page one could dig up if one tried hard enough.... certainly none of the
> vendors you mention.
>
> MichKa
>
> Michael Kaplan
> Trigeminal Software, Inc.
> http://www.trigeminal.com/
-- According to Murphy, nothing goes according to Hoyle. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin Director, International Business mailto:Texin@Progress.com +1-781-280-4271 Fax:+1-781-280-4655 Progress Software Corp. 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sign up now for PROGRESS Worldwide Exchange 2001-Jun-03..07, Washington DC. http://www.progress.com/exchange
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT