> There should be a method to overcome the source sepearation rule which
> might have saved certain identical characters from unification.
>
> > - U+0048 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
> > - U+0397 GREEK CAPITAL LETTER ETA
> > - U+041D CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER EN
> > - U+13BB CHEROKEE LETTER MI
>
> If this were Han glyphs, they would have been unified,
> wouldn't they? ;-)
Florian, I respectfully suggest that you look up the various technical
reports that accompany the Unicode standard. It looks like ther may be
certain confusion about characters and glyphs in respect with the Unicode
standard (which tackles characters, not glyphs; Han *characters* were
unified, and they were in a single *script*). UTR #17
(http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/) should definitely be useful.
See section 2.1 for instance.
Hope this helps,
YA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT