Re: benefits of unicode

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 04:44:42 EDT

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents)"
In reply to: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Next in thread: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Reply: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 11:34 -0700 2001-04-17, Edward Cherlin wrote:

>What about Pali written in any of Sinhala, Thai, Burmese,
>Devanagari, and extended Latin scripts? I know that there is a
>problem for Sanskrit written in Tibetan and other Asian scripts.

What is the question?

-- 
Michael Everson  **  Everson Gunn Teoranta  **   http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn;  Baile an Bh�thair;  Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents)"
In reply to: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Next in thread: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Reply: Edward Cherlin: "Re: benefits of unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT