Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)

From: James Kass ([email protected])
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 08:28:27 EDT

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Roman Czyborra's Unifont, sorry for the typo.

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT