Re: Radical of U+4E71

From: Richard Cook (rscook@socrates.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 15:14:15 EDT

Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Some Char. to Glyph Statistics, Pan/Single Font"
Previous message: Ayers, Mike: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and emai l)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Radical of U+4E71"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> So it seems there is in fact an etymological "hook" radical here, although
> its modern shape has become identical to "second".

The placement of [U+4e82] under a [U+4e59] [U+90e8][U+9996] goes back at
least as far as [U+8aaa][U+6587] (121 AD).

Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Some Char. to Glyph Statistics, Pan/Single Font"
Previous message: Ayers, Mike: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and emai l)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Radical of U+4E71"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT