Re: Radical of U+4E71

From: Richard Cook (rscook@socrates.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 15:14:15 EDT

Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> So it seems there is in fact an etymological "hook" radical here, although
> its modern shape has become identical to "second".

The placement of [U+4e82] under a [U+4e59] [U+90e8][U+9996] goes back at
least as far as [U+8aaa][U+6587] (121 AD).

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT