RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and emai l)

From: Ayers, Mike (Mike_Ayers@bmc.com)
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 12:47:25 EDT

Next message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: RECOMMENDATIONs( Term Asian is not used properly on Computers and NET)"
Maybe in reply to: Ayers, Mike: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and emai l)"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Reply: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

If you have this funny encoding please don't call it UTF8 because it is not
UTF8 and will only confuse users. You could call it OTF8 or something like
that but not UTF8.

How about "WTF-8"?

Sorry - I couldn't resist.

/|/|ike

Next message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: RECOMMENDATIONs( Term Asian is not used properly on Computers and NET)"
Maybe in reply to: Ayers, Mike: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and emai l)"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Reply: Carl W. Brown: "RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT