Re: Shavian

From: Michael Everson (everson@indigo.ie)
Date: Sat Jul 07 2001 - 14:11:35 EDT


At 11:56 -0700 2001-07-06, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

>Tengwar is a completely different case. It meets all the
>criteria, and is appropriate to have on the Roadmap. That doesn't
>mean that it is a high priority -- in fact, as has been pointed
>out, more energy has been spent gassing about it on this
>list than has actually gone into encoding it. But in any
>case I consider it inappropriate to keep labelling it a
>"fictional" script. It is a real script and people use it.

The Roadmap describes Tengwar, Cirth, and Blissymbols as "Scripts for
invented languages".

-- 
Michael Everson



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 14:58:25 EDT