Asmus Freytag wrote (2001-10-17):
>
> Even with a number of errata not yet corrected, the current font is a vast
> improvement over the previously used TTF font (which did not contain any
> glyphs at all for several hundred positions). In the meantime, John said
> it all when he wrote the the identity of the ideograph is given by its
> source mapping, not its glyph in the table.
>
The current font and new charts are most welcome.
A careful check of the glyphs representing characters with less
than five residual strokes (in other words, the easiest ones to
check) shows no other duplicate glyphs. (Also checked along
with the BMP glyphs.)
Building a large CJK font is no easy task, and the font vendor
has done a tremendous job.
Best regards,
James Kass.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Oct 26 2001 - 09:46:24 EDT