Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters

• Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> Who's strongly against it?'re perfectly valid scripts. They

I don't recall any names, but I definitely remember that some people
feel it's trivializing Unicode, and a waste of resources that could
be spent on Real World, if rarely used, scripts.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Private Use Agreements and Unapproved Characters"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Mar 13 2002 - 09:09:49 EST