Kenneth Whistler wrote,
>
> > Another problem with TR28 is that its date is earlier than the date
> > on TR27. This suggests that TR27 is more current.
>
> I don't understand this claim.
>
After misreading the dates and writing the letter last Monday,
the internet connection was lost here for four days!
I stand corrected (or, at least, better informed) on several items
and am thankful to those who contributed to this thread.
Best regards,
James Kass.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jul 06 2002 - 03:48:06 EDT