Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:55:05 EST

Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
Next in thread: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"
Reply: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"
Reply: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kent Karlsson scripsit:

> E.g., it is quite legitimate to render, e.g. LIGATURE FI as an f followed
> by an i, no ligation, whereas that is not allowed for the ae
> ligature/letter, nor for the oe ligature.

How do you know that? Either "Caesar" or "Cæsar" is good Latin.

-- 
After fixing the Y2K bug in an application:     John Cowan
        WELCOME TO <censored>                   jcowan@reutershealth.com
        DATE: SUNDAK, JANUARK 1, 1900           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
Next in thread: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"
Reply: Kent Karlsson: "RE: FAQ entry"
Reply: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:40:44 EST