- Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Custom fonts (was: Tolkien wanta-be)"
- Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: David Starner: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: John Cowan: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Can anyone tell me what languages U+0224 and U+0225 are intended for, or
what legacy charsets they came from?
I've attached a couple of images. LtnZHook_curled.png shows typeforms for
U+0224 / U+0225 similar to those that appear in the code charts. The "hook"
is like a curled terminal on the lower arm. The other image,
LtnZHook_palhk.png, has typeforms that look like z with palatal hook. Would
the latter be considered glyph variants for 0224 / 0225, or are these
distinct characters?
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
(See attached file: LtnZHook_curled.PNG)(See attached file:
LtnZHook_palhk.PNG)
- Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Surrogate supported in Mozilla 1.3"
- Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Custom fonts (was: Tolkien wanta-be)"
- Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: David Starner: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: John Cowan: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: U+0224, U+0225"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 03:09:17 EST