Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 05:59:04 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)"

    At 04:22 -0500 2003-06-27, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:

    >Are we saying that ISO doesn't give a rip for implementation issues?

    Duplication of characters is not the way to fix (forgive me, UTC)
    *Unicode's* error in combining characters.

    >Or that their notion of ordering distinctions is different from
    >Unicode's such that *any* differently ordering permutation of some
    >given set of characters is considered a distinct representation?
    >Are we saying that the voting members of WG2 are not already aware
    >of the issue that has been discussed and incapable of understanding
    >an explanation of these issues addressed to them?

    You might submit your paper to WG2.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 06:56:06 EDT