From: Tex Texin (tex@i18nguy.com)
Date: Sun Jul 06 2003 - 18:29:44 EDT
That looks right to me! Is that the intended use for that character?
Also, I wonder what the correct thing to recommend would be?
Assuming surrogate support was consistently available, and fonts were
available containing this character (are there any today?), since the
character was not generally being written as a single character until now (and
I am still not sure if the pair U+79BE U+4E88 is the correct alternative),
would it be right to recommend this for people to use in number writing going
forward? I tend to think of Ext. B as there for historic and special
characters, not those that might be used every day.
tex
jameskass@att.net wrote:
>
> .
> Tex Texin wrote,
>
> > Apparently JIS didn't have a character for jo. It looks something like the
> > pair: U+79BE U+4E88.
> >
> > Is there a single character for jo in Unicode?
>
> How about U+25771 ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> James Kass
> .
-- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com Making e-Business Work Around the World -------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 06 2003 - 19:00:55 EDT