From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 12:53:46 EDT
Peter Kirk wrote on 07/08/2003 04:23:59 AM:
> Would it work to define a new character, for example, for patah-hiriq
> which has a canonical decomposition into patah plus hiriq, or even into
> hiriq plus patah?
No, because any Unicode normalization form would decompose this, and then
apply canonical reordering, thereby obviating the entire purpose for
adding the digraph character.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 13:33:34 EDT