RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician
From: David J. Perry (hospes.primus@verizon.net)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 07:02:11 EDT
Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
What is Latg vs Latn?
Thanks - David
> Latn has more letters than Latg does, because it's had to add
> more; Latg is older than the current use of Latn, though not
> than Latn's ancestor. Some Latg characters are hard to
> identify if all you know is Latn. But we don't encode them
> separately.
- Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Previous message: William Overington: "Re: [Private Use Area] Audio Description, Subtitle, Signing"
- In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Next in thread: Michael Everson: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Michael Everson: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 07:38:31 EDT