Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 17:16:59 EDT

Next message: Joan_Wardell@sil.org: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> Do you really think that algorithm with all its warts is going to be
> used 50 years from now? I really would like to know.

I certainly do.

-- 
"Clear?  Huh!  Why a four-year-old child        John Cowan
could understand this report.  Run out          jcowan@reutershealth.com
and find me a four-year-old child.  I           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
can't make head or tail out of it."             http://www.reutershealth.com
        --Rufus T. Firefy on government reports

Next message: Joan_Wardell@sil.org: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 28 2003 - 17:57:29 EDT