From: Peter Kirk (peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 15:37:28 EDT
On 07/08/2003 09:27, Kent Karlsson wrote:
>I was so glad that you got things so nearly right for once, and then
>you go and spoil it with:
>
>
>
>>Another similar case would be the use of a isolated nukta (which
>>normally modifies a following base character): the sequence
>><nukta, SPACE>
>>
>>
>
>Like all other combining characters, NUKTA follows the base
>character (the consonant) in the character stream. But I'm not
>sure if <consonant, nukta, vowel> *should* be any different
>from <consonant, vowel, nukta>, but maybe they should be
>different since they are not canonically equivalent. (But...)
>
> /kent k
>
>
>
>
>
Please can you clarify. Is there anything unusual about positioning of
nukta, or is it just like any other combining character? In a sequence
<A, B, nukta, C>, where A, B and C are base characters, where is the
nukta located relative to these three base characters?
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 16:11:21 EDT