From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 17:15:38 EST
From: "Rick McGowan" <rick@unicode.org>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Hebrew composition model, with cantillation marks
> Andrew, There isn't a CJK list.
> Rick
CJK normalization at least does not cause so many problems, as ideographs
are not encoded by combining sequences, but individually (except for some
private ideographs that may be encoded with ideographic description
characters, and basic radicals or strokes, but they all are base character
at class 0 and are not affected by normalization).
So the only discussions in CJK are mostly related to unification of
repertoires from various sources (national standard organisms, research
groups and universitaries, librarians, dictionnaries and their
publishers...)
This focuses much less a large population, but it is certainly a problem
when CJK can be augmented ad infinitum without policies by any one using the
script and constantly inventing new characters in their own EUDC area and
using them to publish something.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 18:04:42 EST