Re: Definitions

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Fri Nov 14 2003 - 06:11:55 EST

  • Next message: jon@hackcraft.net: "Re: Definitions"

    On 14/11/2003 00:20, Philippe Verdy wrote:

    >From: <jameskass@att.net>
    >
    >
    >>Please see
    >>http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/recom.htm
    >>... the section about "Shape of .notdef glyph"
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Thanks for pointing a Microsoft recommandation for the undefined glyph
    >(glyph id=0) that every TT font should implement (so this would affect also
    >OT fonts).
    >
    >But there are several fonts in Windows and Office that still display a
    >normal question mark for this glyph ID, instead of a narrow white box as
    >expected (this may be a caveat within the system compatibility font mappings
    >with system fonts which are not TrueType but simple .FON bitmap fonts)...
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    This is probably because Windows is first mapping your Unicode text on
    to a system code page. The normal behaviour with characters which don't
    have a compatibility type mapping is to map them to "?".

    -- 
    Peter Kirk
    peter@qaya.org (personal)
    peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
    http://www.qaya.org/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 14 2003 - 07:01:14 EST