RE: numeric properties of Nl characters in the UCD

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Thu Nov 27 2003 - 16:27:25 EST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Complex Combining"

    Doug Ewell writes:
    > All these terms, and probably more, have been used to describe a base-n
    > positional number system:
    >
    > binary = 2
    > ternary = 3
    > quaternary = 4
    > octal = 8
    > decimal = 10
    > duodecimal = 12
    > hexadecimal = 16

    Add also:
            quinternary = 5, hexary = 6, septuary = 7, noval or novary = 9
    for tens:
            unodecimal = 11, triodecimal = 13, quadrodecimal = 14,
            pentadecimal = 15, heptadecimal = 17, octodecimal = 18,
            novodecimal = 19
    for twenties:
            bigesimal (or sometimes bidecimal) = 20 (common as an old counting
    system),
                    unobigesimal = 21, duobigesimal = 22, triobigesimal = 23,
                    quadriobigesimal = 24, pentobigesimal = 25, hexobigesimal =
    26,
                    heptobigesimal = 27, octobigesimal = 26, novobigesimal = 29
    similar for other tens:
            trigesimal (or sometimes triogesimal) = 30,
                    unotrigesimal = 31, duobigesimal = 32, ...
            quadrigesimal = 40,
                    unoquadrigesimal = 41, duoquadrigesimal = 42, ...
            sexagesimal = 60 (quite common for time related counts),
                    ...
            heptagesimal = 70,
                    ...
            octagesimal = 80, ...
            novagesimal = 90, ...
    for hundreds:
            centesimal = 100 (quite common),
                    decacentesimal = 110, unodecacentesimal = 111, ...
            bicentesimal = 200
            tricentesimal = 300
            quadricentesimal = 400
            pentacentesimal = 500
            hexacentesimal = 600
            heptacentesimal = 700
            octacentesimal = 800
            novacentesimal = 900
    for thousands:
            millesimal = 1000 (quite common)
            bimillesimal = 2000
            ...
            decamillesimal = 10000 (used for Far East Asian numbering systems)
    :-)
    Some words are ambiguous like tridecimal (sometimes refer to base 30 and not
    13 which is triodecimal with an additional o) or decamillesimal (10000 or
    1010 ?) because of the way prefixes are understood (either additively or as
    multipliers). But you'll find various mathematical litterature using such
    compound terms (generally with a definition if needed, as some authors seem
    to use their own conventions). :-|

    I don't know (or haven't seen) words for millions (gigasimal = 10^6?) or
    billions (terasimal = 10^9?), probably because these words are derived from
    roman latin terms, and the roman numeric system was not representing large
    numbers easily. I think that the prefixes used in international measure
    systems are used with the "-sim-" radical and the "-al" suffix. (May be
    you'll find these words in Arabic or some Indian languages, or in Chinese.)

    __________________________________________________________________
    << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
    Newsletters for me
    You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 27 2003 - 17:05:47 EST