RE: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Dec 03 2003 - 06:04:03 EST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Compression through normalization"

    At 04:12 +0100 2003-12-03, Philippe Verdy wrote:

    >No contradiction here: the default glyphs in Apple's LastResort font
    >show the English name of the script block TWICE (on the top and
    >bottom borders of the surrounding thick frame).

    That isn't true. That is only true in the case of one-word block
    names. Plenty of other block names are long, like ARABIC PRESENTATION
    FORMS-B.

    >Note that this does not require to include the true glyphs for
    >characters of the localized name in the font, but a simplified version
    >of them which is readable enough to be read, so even a bitmap version
    >of the whole name could be used if the font is hinted to display that
    >bitmap in the border only when the border thickness is large enough to
    >display it. So there's no need to create very precise and beautiful
    >letter forms for these indicators which should use a simple sans-serif
    >stroke style to reduce the size of these last resort glyphs and of the
    >whole LastResort font.

    Please stop discussing font design, Philippe, if you wish to avoid offence.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 03 2003 - 06:58:31 EST