Re: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)

From: jon@hackcraft.net
Date: Fri Dec 12 2003 - 07:13:44 EST

  • Next message: Arcane Jill: "RE: Text Editors and Canonical Equivalence (was Coloured diacritics)"

    > Thank you. I was supposing that isolated combining marks were considered
    > in some way defective,

    <blockquote cite="http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch03.pdf">
    D17a: Defective combining character sequence: A combining character sequence
    that does not start with a base character.

    [Explanatory Note] Defective combining character sequences occur when a
    sequence of combining
    characters appears at the start of a string or follows a control or format
    character.
    Such sequences are defective from the point of view of handling of combining
    marks, but are not ill-formed.
    </blockquote>

    "in some way defective" is actually a good way to put it methinks, they aren't
    illegal, and in some cases you can do things with them that are both reasonable
    and useful, but in other situations they may be problematic.

    --
    Jon Hanna                   | Toys and books
    <http://www.hackcraft.net/> | for hospitals:
                                | <http://santa.boards.ie>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 07:59:44 EST