Re: Using characters in context makes a difference.

• Previous message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Using characters in context makes a difference."
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Using characters in context makes a difference."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Benson Margulies scripsit:

> You can count on any media organization anywhere to pick the least
> accurate and most imflammatory view of any story. In my experience, the
> more I know about a subject, the less truth I ever find in a newspaper
> story about it.

I have similar experiences, but I think that Reuters is quite reliable,
neither because they are my employer nor in spite of it. I don't see
any actual error in that story, except that saying "remove the font"
instead of "remove the characters" would have been clearer.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
"You cannot enter here.  Go back to the abyss prepared for you!  Go back!
Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master.  Go!" --Gandalf

• Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "[Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
• Previous message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Using characters in context makes a difference."
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Using characters in context makes a difference."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 14 2003 - 19:01:13 EST