Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 15:25:01 EST

Next message: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [OT] Euro-English (was: Corea? (Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?)"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:09 -0800 2003-12-15, Peter Kirk wrote:

>Then let's hope that ISO 10646 doesn't decide to break its own rules
>and change "KOREAN" to "COREAN" in character names e.g. U+321D.
>Think what that would do to the Unicode stability policy - although
>in fact only five names are affected.

It is offensive to suggest that WG2 would do so.

This thread could die now and it would be OK.

-- 
ME

Next message: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [OT] Euro-English (was: Corea? (Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?)"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 16:11:23 EST