Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 15:21:10 EST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT] Corea? (was: Euro-English...)"

Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:

> Then let's hope that ISO 10646 doesn't decide to break its own rules
> and change "KOREAN" to "COREAN" in character names e.g. U+321D. Think
> what that would do to the Unicode stability policy - although in fact
> only five names are affected.

If they decided not to change "FHTORA" in U+1D0C5, I don't think we have
much to worry about.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT] Corea? (was: Euro-English...)"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Next in thread: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 16:21:16 EST