Re: Stability of WG2 (was: Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 05:37:19 EST

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Stability of WG2"

    At 19:13 -0800 2003-12-15, Doug Ewell wrote:

    >The North Korean and Chinese national bodies have already made proposals
    >that violate both the letter and spirit of stability policies.

    Yes. And we have rejected them.

    >I'm glad the U.S. national body will stay involved, but having to rely
    >on that does sound a bit like having to rely on enlightened statesmen,
    >doesn't it?

    Better than if the whole thing were just left to the employees of
    large companies, Doug. We have good checks and balances.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 06:14:39 EST