Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters

From: Elaine Keown (elaine_keown@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 17:08:01 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: why Aramaic now"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Reply: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Elaine Keown
in Texas

Hi,

> There is zero chance that Phoenician will be
> considered to be a glyph variant of Hebrew.

Many, many Semitists would be truly astonished to read
this sentence.

> >The font for the Samaritan marks is still in
rough > > draft due to what I did in fall....
> What "marks" are these?

Samaritan Bibles have fascinating marks that indicate
the emotion or dramatic interpretation to use in
reading each verse.....pretty nifty!

Elaine

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: why Aramaic now"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Reply: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: why Aramaic now lumpers and splitters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 17:39:55 EST