From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Fri Dec 26 2003 - 10:34:34 EST
From: "Elaine Keown" <elaine_keown@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Your arguments are very calm and rational, but it's
> not that simple. I wish it were.
> Some of the sets of symbols I found---which I simply
> assumed could be added to "Hebrew"--are innately
> controversial because of the Roadmap.
> That's actually true for 3 subsets of symbols that I
> think of as "Extended Hebrew."
How many in total are there?
If you have a set of symbols or punctuation marks which are used with several
different but related scripts why not propose them as a group? Call the group
"Semitic Extended Marks" or something which doesn't tie them to a particular
script. Then nobody needs to argue about whether they should be encoded with
this script or that script.
- Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 26 2003 - 13:36:49 EST