From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Mon Dec 29 2003 - 15:08:57 EST
On 29/12/2003 09:32, Jim Allan wrote:
> ...
> Difference of language means there isn't much use in doing
> cross-searches between material written in Phoenician and material
> written in Greek. The same is not true about cross-searching material
> written in any northwest Semitic language. The languages are very
> close. Names will usually appear identically. It is impossible to say,
> for example, whether the Gezer calendar is written in Phoenician
> language or the Hebrew language or some other closely related language.
>
> ...
> Phoenician should *not* be considered Hebrew. They are different
> languages, though very closely related.
>
Jim, you seem to be almost contradicting yourself here. In fact it is by
no means certain that there were separate Hebrew and Phoenician
languages at the time of the Gezer calendar (9th century BCE? - from
memory). At least they may have been no more different than British and
American English. They did gradually grow apart. But at the start they
were one.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 29 2003 - 15:40:06 EST