Re: Klingon

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 10:46:09 EST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "ConScript (was: Re: Cuneiform - Dynamic vs. Static)"

    From: Chris Jacobs
    > WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT?

    You could have said that without vociferating so loudly. (Against the
    etiquette, no?)

    What is non conforming? The fact that the font uses PUAs? It's not illegal,
    just not guaranteed to be interoperable for the long term across all
    conforming hosts which may have their own PUA conventions.
    So it is used by mutual private agreement between Klingon users, which
    accept the fact that their texts encoded with PUAs may not be readable by
    everyone as it requires a specific font... This means that these texts are
    tightly bound to that font and that this font is to be used within rich-text
    documents (HTML, Word, etc...) or can be used to prepare precomposed
    documents like PDFs...



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 11:30:41 EST