Re: Font Technology Standards

From: Antoine Leca (Antoine10646@leca-marti.org)
Date: Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:48:10 EST

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: What's in a wchar_t string on unix?"

Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: What's in a wchar_t string on unix?"
In reply to: Frank Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Font Technology Standards"
Next in thread: Mete Kural: "Re: Font Technology Standards"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

[sorry for the involontary x-post]

Frank Yung-Fong Tang va escriure:
> For example, we can standarlized a set of Arabic glyphs with their
> encoding.

Think about Nastaliq (rather than Naskh). There is simply no way to have it
done. Too much possibilities.

Idem for Latin (resp. Cyrillic, resp. Greek, whatever) ligatures.

Antoine

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: What's in a wchar_t string on unix?"
Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: What's in a wchar_t string on unix?"
In reply to: Frank Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Font Technology Standards"
Next in thread: Mete Kural: "Re: Font Technology Standards"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:33:26 EST