From: fantasai (fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net)
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 20:41:02 EST
Peter Kirk wrote:
> On 31/03/2004 14:25, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
>
>> Peter Kirk scripsit:
>>
>>> But, as Ken has just clarified, with NBSP Louis' neck may be
>>> stretched rather uncomfortably, if not cut completely. Here is what I
>>> don't want to see (fixed width font required):
>>>
>>> Louis XVI was
>>> guillotined in
>>> 1793.
>>
>> This, however, is a matter of presentation rather than semantics, and
>> as such fitly belongs in the realm of presentational markup. In HTML,
>> one might specify <tt> </tt> to generate a fixed-width space.
>
> I disagree. Surely there is something SEMANTICALLY different about the
> space in "Louis XVI". One semantic difference is that it is
> non-breaking. But another one is that these words should not be split
> apart. An additional semantic distinction might be that they should be
> treated as one word for the purposes of word breaking algorithms.
non-breaking and non-stretching are presentational properties, not
semantic ones. They don't change the meaning of the space: it's still
just a space, not a hyphen or the letter "g". They don't affect
non-visual media; we don't break lines in spoken speech. "Louis XVI"
is semantically different from "Louis' head" because the former is a
bare noun whereas the latter is a noun phrase, but as far as the reader
is concerned, they're both separated with "a space". Whether the space
breaks or not or stretches or not has no effect on either the meaning
or correctness of the text. It only affects its (visual) aesthetic
quality.
~fantasai
-- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 31 2004 - 21:24:29 EST