RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: Mike Ayers ([email protected])
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 17:03:49 CDT

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> > Anyone who thinks there has to be a separate
> > encoding for Phoenician either does not understand
> > Unicode or (and probably "and") does not understand
> > what a glyph is.

Was this meant to be a joke?

/|/|ike

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 19 2004 - 17:04:45 CDT