Re: ISO 15924

From: Philippe Verdy ([email protected])
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 09:49:55 CDT

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "ISO 15924"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Michael Everson" <[email protected]>
> Are there any further comments on the beta tables?

Beside the typo "traditionel" (instead of the correct "traditionnel"), and the
French name for "Ge'ez" which should be "guèze" according to ISO639, I have no
more comments.

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "ISO 15924"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 09:50:19 CDT