From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 20:37:28 CDT
On 2004.06.10, 20:50, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> In at least one case I suspect that a character named 'script' was
> actually intended for an *italic* shape.
In principle, all "holes" in the ranges
U+1D434..U+1D49D,
U+1D608..U+1D66F,
U+1D6E2..U+1D755 and
U+1D790..U+1D7C9
(those with italics style) correspond to already encoded "letter like"
characters with italics style.
These are... hm, only U+1D455 -- which points to U+210E : PLANCK
CONSTANT (which name does not include a misused "script")...
I'd expect U+212F : SCRIPT SMALL E, but is is refered at the non
existent U+1D4BA, from the script block, not italics.
-- ____.
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt> |####|
PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 934 821 700 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 10 2004 - 21:49:47 CDT