From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:42:33 CDT
That problem has been reported several times. There is a document proposing a
fix, but there was not enough time at the UTC meeting last week to take up the
topic.
Mark
__________________________________
http://www.macchiato.com
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theo Veenker" <Theo.Veenker@let.uu.nl>
To: "unicode" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Sun, 2004 Jun 20 23:49
Subject: 2nd attempt: final_sigma vs final_cased
> Hi,
>
> Is there somebody out there who can answer this question?
>
> Casing context Final_Sigma is being used in SpecialCasing.txt, but its
> specification is no longer present in the standard (at least I can't
> find it). Obviously this context is now called Final_Cased, but the
> specification for Final_Cased (section 3.13) is not identical to that
> of Final_Sigma (UAX 21, superseded).
>
> regexp Final_Cased:
> Before C [{cased=true}][{wordBoundary!=true}]*
> After C !([{wordBoundary!=true}]*[{cased=true}])
>
> regexp Final_Sigma:
> Before C <cased> <case-ignorable>*
> After C !(<case-ignorable>* <cased>)
>
> Is the old specification of Final_Sigma still valid for determining
> the final sigma casing context, or are there situations where it
> is inadequate? What I mean is are these specification actually
> the same WRT final sigma?
>
> Theo
>
> PS. I sometimes have the feeling that I'm on the wrong list here.
> Most discussions are about characters, almost never about
> implementation issues. Is there a unicode developers list
> perhaps that I'm unaware of?
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:44:26 CDT