RE: Unicode's Mandate

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Sat Mar 05 2005 - 09:15:58 CST

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: But E0000 Custom Language Tags Are Actually *Required* For Use By Unicode"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: But E0000 Custom Language Tags Are Actually *Required* For Use By Unicode"
In reply to: UList@dfa-mail.com: "Re: Unicode's Mandate"
Next in thread: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Unicode's Mandate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I would love "flexibility" like an "eXtensible Glyph Format".

Sounds like an interesting idea.

> I'm not fond of "flexibility", like some important
> functionality getting put
> in the hands of proprietary non-standard smart font behavior.

Unicode didn't put that functionality in anyone's hands proprietary or
otherwise. Unicode didn't have its hands on that functionality to be putting
it anywhere.

Regards,
Jon Hanna
Work: <http://www.selkieweb.com/>
Play: <http://www.hackcraft.net/>
Chat: <irc://irc.freenode.net/selkie>

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: But E0000 Custom Language Tags Are Actually *Required* For Use By Unicode"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: But E0000 Custom Language Tags Are Actually *Required* For Use By Unicode"
In reply to: UList@dfa-mail.com: "Re: Unicode's Mandate"
Next in thread: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Unicode's Mandate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 05 2005 - 09:14:47 CST