Re: ISO character sets stable under NFC?

From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Mon Mar 28 2005 - 14:15:12 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Apostrophe (was: Re: Security Issues:  Navajo)"

    Ken is most likely right; but it'd be better to test them to be sure.

    ‎Mark

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Kenneth Whistler" <kenw@sybase.com>
    To: <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
    Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 11:08
    Subject: Re: ISO character sets stable under NFC?

    > Elliotte Rusty Harold asked:
    >
    > > Question:
    > >
    > > Aside from 8859-1, which, if any, of the ISO 8859 character sets are
    > > stable under normalization form C?
    >
    > It should be *all* of them.
    >
    > --Ken
    >
    > >
    > > For example, suppose I have a string of Unicode characters, each of
    > > which is defined in ISO-8859-2. I then normalize this string according
    > > to NFC. Is it guaranteed that the resulting string will be
    > > character-per-character identical to the original string?
    > >
    > > I believe this is true for 8859-1. Is it true for any of the other 8859
    > > character sets?
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 28 2005 - 14:16:32 CST