Re: Does Unicode 4.1 change NFC?

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:32:37 CST

  • Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Sindhi characters proposed"

    "Philippe Verdy" <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr> writes:

    >> Yes. New CJK compatibility ideographs U+FA70..U+FAD9 have canonical
    >> decompositions into single characters. For example NFC(U+FACF) =
    >> U+2284A (for the first time a BMP character is normalized to something
    >> outside BMP).
    >
    > Isn't that against Unicode statibility? Shouldn't it have been the
    > reverse, keeping U+FACF stable and normalizing U+2284A to U+FACF to
    > keep the compatibility?

    I said *new* CJK compatibility ideographs. U+FA70..U+FAD9 were
    unassigned in earlier versions of Unicode.

    -- 
       __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
       \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
        ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:33:17 CST