RE: Unicode Bloopers

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:18:39 CST

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Unicode lexer"

Previous message: Frank Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode lexer"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew C. West: "Unicode Bloopers"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "RE: Unicode Bloopers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On
> Behalf Of Andrew C. West

> The bottom of this page also gives a list of Unicode characters that
are
> mistakes that should never have been encoded in the first place. I've
only
> got
> one entry so far (U+156F "CANADIAN SYLLABICS TTH"), but I'm sure that
> there are
> quite a few lurking around (especially in the CJK-B block), so let me
know
> if
> you know of any.

I know of entire ranges of characters (one of them quite large) that
some would like to reckon this way. It wouldn't be appropriate to
actually list them, however.

Peter Constable

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Unicode lexer"
Previous message: Frank Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode lexer"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew C. West: "Unicode Bloopers"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "RE: Unicode Bloopers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:21:35 CST