Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue May 31 2005 - 17:34:08 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1"

    At 17:43 -0400 2005-05-31, Patrick Andries wrote:

    >> 4) Why ``SMALL LETTER IOTATED SMALL YUS'' instead of ``SMALL LETTER
    >>IOTIFIED LITTLE YUS'', which in my opinion would be more compatible with the
    >>Cyrillic counterpart?
    >
    >I also had noticed, I hoped the new form is better in English but I
    >agree that this means consistency is not preserved.

    I also did not "preserve consistency" when I proposed LATIN CAPITAL
    LETTER HWAIR. And there are other examples of this practice in the
    standard, I am sure. 

    -- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 31 2005 - 17:45:46 CDT