Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)

From: asadek@st-elias.com
Date: Mon Jul 04 2005 - 12:46:46 CDT

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: [A12n-Collab] Font companies serving academia/linguists"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Bob Hallissy" <Bob_Hallissy@sil.org>

    > > Is this decision process transparent and documented?
    >
    > See http://www.unicode.org/consortium/utc.html.

    Well, what are you saying? There is no written documented rationale (this is not a minor point!) and these decisions are only debated at the UTC?

    What about written documented traces of past decisions from the ISO corresponding commitee? Is this ISO committee just a rubberstamping organisation once the UTC has met?

    Ashraf Sadek 

    --
St Elias Coptic Community

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 04 2005 - 12:47:46 CDT