From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 16:03:52 CDT
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Chris Jacobs
> > We have an XML based application...
> Only it does not stand for e acute, as far as unicode is involved it
just
> stands for itself, for é.
>
> Of course you are allowed to have agreements with your users about
replacing
> é by e acute or by whatever you want to replace it by.
Since this is an XML application, then at the level of XML parsing,
é must be interpreted as e-acute; he is not allowed to have
agreements with his users about replacing é with anything else.
As already noted, Unicode says nothing about this, since this is a
higher level protocol.
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 12 2005 - 16:05:24 CDT