Re: Letters for Indic transliteration

From: Andreas Prilop (nhtcapri@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 11:10:55 CDT

  • Next message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Letters for Indic transliteration"

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Raymond Mercier wrote:

    >> 090B 098B 0D0B R with ring below -- --
    >> 095C 09DC -- R with dot below 1E5A 1E5B
    >
    > This distinction between dot-below and ring-below does not reflect the
    > Nagari or other Indian script, but is just an accidental glyph variant in
    > latin transcriptions.

    No; see above. One is U+090B and one is U+095C.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 11:11:44 CDT