RE: Letters for Indic transliteration

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Wed Jul 20 2005 - 18:07:34 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: Letters for Indic transliteration"

    Mark Davis wrote:
    > First, ISO uses the term 'transliteration' to mean a reverseable
    transformation, and 'transliteration' to mean a non-reversable one.
    Correction: they use "transcription" to mean a non-reversable one.
    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 20 2005 - 18:08:35 CDT